Monday Mix—Wine Judging—The Lighter Side—Amateur Winemaking Competition

Last Monday I led you through the judging procedures at the giant, world-renowned San Francisco International Wine Competition. www.sfwinecomp.com Four thousand wines. Eleven judging panels. Three days of tasting. Medals galore. Major prestige. Winery reputations made; bottom lines boosted. Pretty darn intense.
Today we’re going to kick back a bit. I judged another wine competition this month, and I’d like to bring you along with me to this one too. As with the SF International, medals here mean a lot. But they won’t affect a winery’s sales—by definition.
That’s because this is an amateur winemaking competition. It’s part of the Marin County Fair, which takes place each year during Fourth of July weekend. (I'll share some fun audio with you on an upcoming podcast.) I signed up on a lark, and showed up at the fairgrounds (right behind the landmark Frank Lloyd Wright-designed Marin Civic Center) for the preliminary round, with no idea what to expect.
After a warm welcome from Bernie Rooney, the event director, I made my way to the small grouping of tables in the back corner. I introduced myself to the judges who were seated there already, and they filled me in on the setup.
Each of the four tables had a piece of paper on it with the names of three or so types of wines. I spotted the magic “P” word, and quickly sat down at the “Chardonnay, Pinot, Syrah” table. My best friend Christina joined me (she’s done amateur winemaking for years, and has an excellent palate), then two fine fellows who had greeted me earlier filled in the last two seats.
Although the actual results (e.g. “Gold Medal,” “Best Red,” “Best in Show”) would eventually be similar, the actual judging procedure differed quite a bit from the SF International. (And any differences I point out have nothing to do with “a better way”; both sets of protocols are perfectly valid and work quite well all around.)
Rather than presenting us with full flights of wines (the 10 to 15 glasses or so at a time that’s SOP at the SF International), our panel coordinator brought out just one wine at a time—a bottle in a paper bag, marked only with wine type and code number (see pic). Then we would pass the bottle around the table and pour our own.
Our task was to evaluate the wine in great detail (the winemakers would later receive our actual comments about their entries), also rating them numerically in categories such as “appearance,” “aroma” and “finish.” Then, after each wine, we would turn in its scoresheet. (At SF International, we keep our paperwork, and later we receive a long list of the wines, with their codes, so that we can write about—or better yet purchase—the ones we like.)
Another difference is that our ratings didn’t directly address the question of medals. Bernie and his tabulators (wasn’t that a ‘70s band?) would do that afterwards, in preparation for the final Sweepstakes round, held two weeks later. That’s when we judge the “best of the best,” comparing apples and oranges (in some cases, almost literally!) to decide, for instance, “Best White” in a group that might contain the Best Chardonnay, Best Riesling, Best Sauvignon Blanc, and more. (BTW, the SF International handles the sweepstakes round in the same way, just with lots more wineglasses.)
Next time I’ll fill in more details, bring you to the Sweepstakes, and reveal the results. (And yes, I did get to discover a “perfect” 20-point wine—a gorgeous Pinot Noir that could easily have snagged a Gold or even Double Gold in a professional judging.)
Cheers for now,
Rosina
gilded fork, wine, wine writing, Welcome to Wine Country, Rosina Tinari Wilson
Labels: marin, Marin County Fair, monday mix, Pinot Noir, San Francisco International Wine Competition, wine education, wine judging, wine tasting


